首页> 外文OA文献 >Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk.
【2h】

Effectiveness of a social influences smoking prevention program as a function of provider type, training method, and school risk.

机译:根据提供者类型,培训方法和学校风险的不同,社会影响吸烟预防计划的有效性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVES: This study determined the effect of provider (nurse or teacher) and training method (workshop or self-preparation) on outcomes of a social influences smoking prevention program. METHODS: One hundred elementary schools were stratified by school risk score (high risk = high smoking rate among senior students) and assigned randomly to conditions: (1) teacher/self-preparation, (2) teacher/workshop, (3) nurse/self-preparation, (4) nurse/workshop, and (5) control. Intervention occurred in grades 6 to 8. Smoking status at the end of grade 8 was the primary endpoint variable. RESULTS: Intervention reduced grade 8 smoking rates in high-risk schools (smoking rates of 26.9% in control vs 16.0% in intervention schools) but not in low-risk schools. There were no significant differences in outcome as a function of training method and no significant differences in outcome between teacher-provided and nurse-provided interventions in high- and medium-risk schools. Although nurses achieved better outcomes than did teachers in low-risk schools, neither provider type achieved outcomes superior to the control condition in those schools. CONCLUSIONS: Workshop training did not affect outcomes. Teachers and nurses were equally effective providers. Results suggest that programming should target high-risk schools.
机译:目的:本研究确定了提供者(护士或老师)和培训方法(车间或自我准备)对社会影响吸烟预防计划结果的影响。方法:按学校风险评分(高风险=高烟民中的高吸烟率)对一百所小学进行分层,并随机分配以下条件:(1)老师/自我准备,(2)老师/工作坊,(3)护士/自我准备,(4)护士/车间和(5)控制。干预发生在6至8年级。8年级结束时的吸烟状况是主要终点变量。结果:干预措施降低了高风险学校的8年级吸烟率(对照学校的吸烟率为26.9%,干预学校的吸烟率为16.0%),但低风险学校没有。作为培训方法的函数,结果没有显着差异,在高中风险学校中,教师提供和护士提供的干预之间的结果也没有显着差异。尽管在低风险学校中护士取得了比教师更好的结果,但两种提供者类型均未取得优于这些学校控制条件的结果。结论:讲习班培训不会影响结果。老师和护士是同样有效的提供者。结果表明,编程应针对高风险学校。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号